![]() This strategy was applied by the German armies during the first years of the Second World War, in particular against Poland and France, in the famous "Blitz Krieg", which was based as much on mobility as on the fire power of the panzers. supply, depriving him of the means to continue the fight. If initially this tool was limited to piercing enemy lines, especially for crossing enemy trenches, progress in terms of tank mobility made it possible to extend this notion of rupture to a more global level, by attacking the lines. ![]() ![]() By its firepower, its mobility and its mass, the tank can indeed destroy the opposing points of resistance, while creating, like the cavalry charges of the Middle Ages, a certain amazement in the adversary. Since the First World War, the main battle tank has continued to carry the same priority, namely to create a break in the opposing lines. Can we, therefore, design a new generation combat tank that is actually more efficient than the previous generation, without succumbing to the almost systematic increase in weight, gun caliber, and ultimately, price? The answer to this question requires going into a little more detail in the "tank theory". The Israeli CARMEL program plans to design a 35-ton armored vehicle, very mobile, highly digitized, served by a crew of only 2 men, initially designed to take over from the Merkava. Yet there is a program that radically changes paradigms in this area. As a new generation of battle tanks emerges today, with the T-14 Armata in Russia, and MGCS in Europe, the paradigms that underlie their development seem unchanged, with ever more protection and more firepower, so as to sustain the fire of the adversary while destroying it before he himself cannot destroy it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |